Many random spontaneous processes occur ceaselessly as can be discerned through intelligent inquiry. At best, we can have a logical answer to how and why it happens in the first place. Attempting to attribute intentional purpose to these phenomena is a common yet flawed approach, born from misunderstanding the underlying science of the phenomena. Consider, for example, water converting into steam. Asking “Why does water turn into steam?” can quickly spiral into an infinite loop of unanswered questions, no matter how deeply you explain molecular behaviors under pressure and heat. Eventually, you might always return to, “Exactly, but why does that happen?” The question of “why” necessitates a will or a purpose by itself. At best, this is a question of “how” and not “why”.
Photo by Chase Clark on Unsplash
Defining Purpose-Driven Sense of Curiosity (PDSC)
Attempting to answer such perpetual “why” questions unknowingly embraces a Purpose Driven Sense of Curiosity (PDSC). This PDSC refers to an assumption that everything must inherently have an intentional purpose or justification behind its existence or behavior. Although natural and intuitive to human curiosity, this mindset can dangerously misguide rational thought.
To illustrate clearly, consider the claims of figures such as Deepak Chopra, whose misconceptions about consciousness led him to attribute sentience or purpose to particles like atoms and quarks. This misplaced attribution of PDSC can mislead one into believing non-living objects require purposes, causing profound confusion about reality.
The Pitfalls of Purpose-Driven Curiosity
Purpose Driven Sense of Curiosity (PDSC) is fundamentally incompatible with science and reason. It distorts phenomena by exaggerating their significance beyond rational interpretation. This tendency often leads to pseudo-scientific thinking, where unclear concepts are readily answered with overly simplistic or comforting explanations. Religion historically exemplifies this with blanket answers such as “God’s will” or “It’s beyond human understanding.” Such responses halt genuine curiosity and discourage further inquiry, reinforcing ignorance.
Ironically, even rational people sometimes shut down curiosity prematurely by limiting possibilities strictly to what seems immediately conceivable. By prematurely limiting explanations to what appears obvious or comfortable, we stifle meaningful exploration and critical thinking.
Asking the Right Questions
Effective inquiry begins with asking the correct questions. “Why?” is often not the best starting point for true understanding. For instance, “How are we here?” is substantially more informative and scientifically productive than “Why are we here?” The latter presumes purpose, potentially steering inquiry towards unverifiable speculation rather than observable phenomena.
People frequently ask questions like “Why was the universe created?” as though the universe must justify its existence similarly to living beings. This anthropomorphic framing misguides inquiry from the start. A more scientifically productive approach is to ask “How was the universe created?” or “What processes led to its current form?” These properly structured questions enable meaningful exploration and yield tangible insights into cosmic evolution.
The Danger of Purpose-Driven Sense of Curiosity (PDSC)
By presupposing inherent purpose in all phenomena, Purpose-Driven Sense of Curiosity (PDSC) subtly endorses irrational interpretations of reality and limits objective understanding. It captivates rational thought by reinforcing unfounded assumptions, perpetuating ignorance, and obstructing genuine knowledge.
It is unrealistic to expect universal rationality; human beings naturally seek purpose and comfort. However, critical thinking demands vigilance against PDSC’s irrational tendencies. Overcoming purpose-driven curiosity allows intellectual freedom and genuine understanding, helping us address complex problems effectively rather than superficially.
In conclusion, let us consciously choose rational, evidence-based curiosity over comforting, purpose-driven assumptions, at least when pursuing serious understanding. This choice not only strengthens our reasoning but also profoundly enriches our intellectual lives.